Total Pageviews

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Oh my goodness gracious, I've had no less than three different dommes message me to speak about the last entry. Apparently all of them of the `fix my roof and we'll call that `service'' type. All of them had some not very nice things to say to me, all of them with hidden profiles, and all of them thought it best to block me from any reply. (I laugh pretty loudly when anything that goes against someone's views is considered `not the true lifestyle'.)

That's really kind of silly when you think about it, as the reason they (Well, i'm not at all sure it wasn't the same person with different names seeing as all of this happened on the same day withing about an hour.) were messaging me to read me the riot act was because of what they read on this blog. Umm, blocking me from replying to your message really only increases the chance what I have to say in reply will end up here... I mean really, if you've read this blog you should know this.

Now, to be specific... I mentioned that sort of domme one example of the sort of dommes submissive men must wade through.. But let me be a little MORE specific about what I mean about that sort. They expect in the name of `service,' to have submssives perform labor for them. Things that would cost quite a bit of coin to have to pay for... in the name of service without any regard whatsoever for the submissive's own desires or fetishes... The reasoning there is if they are trullllllllllly submissive and wish to serve, it shouldn't matter right? (Heh, now I know you fellows know exactly what happens when YOU try to pull that shit on a submissive woman, yes yes?)

Yeah, so tell me this... How does that make that sort of `domme' any different from the financial cunts whose idea of `service' involves gift cards and wish lists.... Making it clear the submissive can (or should) expect nothing in return for the payment?

Yes, yes, that's TRUE service and those who don't understand that don't understand the "lifestyle."



Mmkay folks, now I have a question for all of you. Feel free to post your answers to this question here as a comment, or in a message to me at Collarme. First, let me show you this excerpt from the profile of a 21 lesbian submissive in Kansas.

"- Under the protection of XxxXxxxx. If you insist on being an ass, expect a message from him regarding your behavior -"

Right then, if you were to take the time to look up the person who has that girl under protection, you will find this is a 34 male dominant in Cornwall, United Kingdom. at the bottom of his profile you will find this...

"On a side note? 'XxxxXxxxXxxxx' is under my protection. She is a very special someone and my life is a better place for having her in it. Do not mess with her unless you want to hear from the not so easy-going side of me. Trust me, you don't, so let's just avoid that. Show her some respect. She is lovely, and she deserves it."

Got it... Got it... One is in Kansas and the other is located about 4,000 miles away in the UK. My question is, what in the blue monkey hell can this clown be protecting her from and HOW can he protect her other than sending a strongly worded message and being an Internet tough guy?


There was something else a few months ago that struck me as totally stupid.

It was a submissive woman in Florida and her dominant man in Holland or Denmark. He was messaging people he thought were close to her, trying to hook her up with people so that she could get some experience... Under his supervision of course.

Welllllll... This cat messaged me wondering if I were close enough to this woman and I had a couple of questions for him. One, I wanted to know why HE wasn't giving her this experience he felt she needed.

His answer was that even though they had a very close relationship it just wasn't possible for them to meet in real life. *smirk*

So... How exactly was he planning to `supervise' this, and how does he get the idea that he had any business trying to handle the affairs of someone he already knows he has absoutely no chance to meet in person and is so far away there is no possible way to step in if needed?

I asked those things and wouldn't you know it, he could give no real answer to those questions other than it just `feels right.' I know, doesn't that just take the biscuit?

Okay, I get that many people do this D/s stuff strictly online and that's cool with me. But the above is one of things that just strike me as stupid, not to mention irresponibile of the guy in Holland. I'd also wonder about the woman in Florida who was apparently okay with someone that far away selecting people for her to see in real life...Not to mention how it gives creedence to the idea of being involved with D/s and having your common sense magically disappear.
 
I said it was a few months ago, this particular arrangement no longer exists.

Fuck, I completely got sidetracked and forgot to ask the question. Actually, I forgot the question.. Carry on..



Along the same theme of things in people's profile that make you go, "hmm..."
This is a 55 male dominant in Reno, Nevada who posted as a journal something called the `Female Slave Manifesto.' Now it's written as from the viewpoint of a female slave, but it is clearly written by an internet dom.

Oh, how do I know it was clearly written by an internet Dom? Easily, just put that phrase into Google and the first entry will lead you to the post in the usenet newsgroup alt.sadistic in November of 1998,  and it begins with this..

"These are the words that please the extreme sadist.
I have created them from a composite of several slaves who
served me to the utmost."

So yeah, an online dom wrote it..Read it and tell me how many women you know who are actually like this...

Nevermind that.. here's the part of his profile that makes me go, "huh?"

"I am in great shape, high stamina (fucking 2-3 times DAILY), seek daily use off an on as we deal with the real world in between. My slave would not have to work outside the home but stay in the home naked, collared and used DAILY.  I never want things to become stagnant."

Of course, of course he's got his ideal in mind as does everyone.. But tell me, if you are in fact fucking 2-3 times a day already... (fucking, not tossing off to porn or any such shit like that..).... If you are in fact doing all this fucking on a daily basis, and working full time seeing as how your doormat won't have to work, how do you even have time to be online as often as you are looking for someone who embodies that Female Slave's Manifesto? Oh the Bitch knows you're online a lot. Everytime I logon guess whose name always right at the top? Also, when you find this doormat to keep around naked and collared, will this increase your fucking output or will whomever you're fucking 2 and 3 times a day now be getting a break when the fucking duties are split between them and the doormat?

Look, this is important shit to know!




Here's someone who messaged me to tell me that I was player and then promptly blocked me... I love the homophobic profile of this 67 dominant in Hamilton Ontario, Canada..
"Xxx
      Xxxxx
                Xxx
SIRRR
Is not interested in bi or gay males period.        

NOT into CDs....NOT. Why can't males read english?  I am NOT, NOT, NOT bi.
you can also find Me at XxxXxxxXxxxxxx.

BDSM is not just about sex, that is a very small part of it.. We are open to most and love to entertain....smiles.."

The part about not being into CD's is written in very LARGE type.. He wouldn't want you missing it ya see.

Well tell me, if the sex aspect is `very small' part of BDSM, why does it matter if it's a CD? No really, I keep hearing how BDSM isn't about sex from many people.. If that's the case what does straight, bi, or gay have to do with it?

C'mon gomer, just admit it IS about sex.. as it is for MANY people into BDSM.




Here's one that is actually rather cute in a somewhat fucked up way. We know about the famous BillInBoston (New name is BillInNH) who was and is behind some screennames such as SandraFrasier, LisaMarieRI, SandraGilbert, KarenBlack, Sandra68, Sandra688... amongst others.

He's using a new name lately called Karenonmyown and this one has a male sub and a picture of this sub wearing panties, holding a sign that says, "This cock belongs to Mistress Karen."

I'm sure the irony is unintentional on his part, but the statement is more true than meets the eye. Why? Because the photo is of none other than BillInBoston (BillinNH) himself. Heh, he belongs to himself.. I love it.

Rock on Bill!



Okay, one more and i'll stop for now... This is a 19 female switch in Utah, and the relevant part of her profile is the first line...

"*****Under Possible Consideration*****"


Mmkay, is this a brand new designation within the realm of D/s relationships? Someone is considering whether or not to consider her is what it sounds like to me. What I'm wondering here is whether the vanilla designation of this is `engaged to be engaged?'



No  wait!!!... ONE more.. and I have a funny feeling this one is going to be like peeling an onion or some shit like that. But while browsing I came across this profile from someone called YurixX, a 23 female dominant in Durham, North Carolina.... Here's the profile..

"YurixK is a fake. My and her pics are from a girl I tricked on okcupid. Don't trust anyone with this girls pics. I have more of her that they don't have. Not wanting any thing but for them to be exposed thank you."

And then there's a journal on 8-22-2013...

"YurixK started as a profile to make me admit I am not real and is now a profile trying to use the pics I had to be a profile. Flag him without mercy"

Right then.. I looked for the profile of YurixK and find it's a 23 female dominant in Durham, North Carolina. Same person in the photos, and here's this one's profile..

"After careful consideration, I have decided to take missrachel1 as my new pet. She's rather a huge slut and can't get enough so all of you please feel free to use her with my blessing. Just remember to tell her that her Mistress YuriX sent you."

Still with me? So this YurixK person created a profile to make that YurixX person admit he was a fake, and is now trying to be a normal profile.. So let's peel some more of this onion and see what we can find.. Let's look at this missrachel1 that is mentioned on K's profile...

Missrachel1 is an 18 female dominant in the UK, and there's no written profile.. but there are several journals, here's the latest one on 7-19-2013.

"YurixX is threatening me she says i sent her pic which i didnt if she found pic of me i dont know how she got them and will upload them if i dont take down her pics but i do have one more that she sent that i haven't put up until now."

Right...Right.. This is starting to get weird.. this journal entry is speaking of X.. but K has photos in their profile of the same person in missrachel's profile.. So let's go to the scorecards..

X was messing around with this missrachel1 person... (I'm going to assume they were playing that favorite game of fake lesbians, break or be broken. seeing how X's profile photo shows that person with `slave' written on her arm...)And now K, who according to X was created to make X admit they were a fake... has apparently gone after missrachel1.. Of course if one were to (And I did, by the way) do a photo search on this missrachel1's photos, one would find missrachel1 is in fact a fake.

Mmkay.. back to the scorecard and let's see if we now have the whole picture.

YurixX tricked some girl on OKCupid into sending some photos, which they in turn used to create a profile on CM.. Played around with this missrachel1 person, ended up threatening missrachel1 with photos. Enter YurixK who creates a profile designed to catch YurixX being a fake...Then continues on with photos of missrachel1 in THAT profile and a profile that says they've taken missrachel1 as a pet.

Let's bring this full circle.. I messaged this K person and asked about YurixX's claims... You folks hold on tight.. Y'all are gonna love the reply I got.. Ready?

"From: 
 YurixK

 Dated: 
 8/24/13 2:37 PM 

what he says is true. what he doesn't say is i am the one from okcupid he tricked into sending pics." 

Folks, just let it sink in slowly.. I suspect it's all a load of bullshit, but that was fucking FUNNY!

And on that note.. L8r peepz